Whistleblowers exposing corrupt climate science can no longer be silenced By Lawrence Solomon, Financial Post of 16 Feb 2017
Lawrence Solomon: Finally it’s safe for the whistleblowers of corrupted climate science to speak out. Whistleblowers at the U.S. government's official keeper of the global warming stats, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), claim their agency doctored temperature data to hide the fact that global temperatures plateaued and cooled (hydroloop.org/mini-ice-age/) from 20 years ago.
Can the whistleblowers be believed in this claim, originally made in 2015? And in the further claim that NOAA then rushed this doctored data into print in time for the UN's Paris global warming summit of world leaders, to dupe any doubters that the planet was in fact overheated?
Of course the whistleblowers can be believed, and not just because NOAA repeatedly stonewalled inquiries, even failing to comply with a congressional subpoena. No one paying attention can have any doubt that the governmental global warming enterprise has been a fraud. It's been lies from the start, starting with the very mandate of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which astonishingly ruled out factors like the sun as being worthy of investigation.
Among those astonished was the Danish delegation to the IPCC. It discovered at one of the IPCC's early meetings a quarter-century ago that its scientists could not present their study, newly published in the prestigious journal Science, showing a remarkable correlation between global warming and solar activity. To their further astonishment, to squelch dissent the IPCC cabal set out to destroy the reputation of its chief author, falsely accusing him of fabricating data. Whistleblowers now know they will no longer be silenced. Dissenters from the climate change orthodoxy soon learned that, if they refused to recant, they stood to lose their jobs, their funding, and their reputations. They also learned the corollary: to get hired, to get funded, to get promoted, they needed to produce the science the authorities wanted. Governments annually spent billions of dollars on climate change research, virtually all of it commissioned to prove that the science was settled — that man-made climate change represented an existential threat to the planet. None of the billions spent on research amounted to anything — none of the models proved reliable, none of the predictions were borne out, none of the expected effects materialized.
- The Arctic ice cap hasn't disappeared,
- Polar bear populations haven't declined,
- Hurricanes haven't become more common,
- Malaria hasn't spread,
- Temperatures haven't continued to climb.
What did materialize was fraud after fraud. Climategate — the 2009 revelations of hacked emails showing scientists labouring to manipulate data and cover their tracks — was followed by Climategate 2.0 (a second damning batch of hacked emails), by Amazongate (the revelation that the IPCC's claim of coming devastation in the Amazon was based on non-peer-reviewed research by WWF eco-activists), Glaciergate (here the IPCC relied on speculation in a popular magazine) and other scandals. The mega-fraud was the assertion that the science was settled, which the IPCC trumpeted with claims that 2,500 scientists from around the world endorsed its findings. Except those 2,500 — a number that was soon inflated to 3,000 and then 4,000 — didn't endorse anything. They merely reviewed some of the studies heaved into the IPCC's maw, many of them giving the research the thumbs down
"97% of the world’s climate scientists” accept the consensus
This number will prove a new embarrassment to the pundits and press who use it. The number stems from a 2008 master’s thesis by student Maggie Kendall Zimmerman at the University of Illinois, under the guidance of Peter Doran, an associate professor of Earth and environmental sciences. The two researchers obtained their results by conducting a survey of 10,257 Earth scientists. The survey results must have deeply disappointed the researchers — in the end, they chose to highlight the views of a subgroup of just 77 scientists, 75 of whom thought humans contributed to climate change. The ratio 75/77 produces the 97% figure that pundits now tout.
The two researchers started by altogether excluding from their survey the thousands of scientists most likely to think that the Sun, or planetary movements, (hydroloop.org/solar) might have something to do with climate on Earth — out were the solar scientists, space scientists, cosmologists, physicists, astronomers, and meteorologists.
That left the 10,257 scientists in such disciplines as geology, geography, oceanography, engineering, paleontology and geochemistry who were somehow deemed more worthy of being included in the consensus. The two researchers also decided scientific accomplishment should not be a factor in who could answer — those surveyed were determined by their place of employment (an academic or a governmental institution). Neither was academic qualification a factor — about 1,000 of those surveyed did not have a PhD, some didn’t even have a master’s diploma.
After our article was posted on NOAA facebook page, we received this private message :
NASA (US), ESA (Europe), CNSA (China), ISRO (India), Roscosmos (Russia), and other Space Institutions real missions; to deceive Humanity and for the government and their contractors to make money from tax payers. Space Programs real issues.
Disinformation Program Progress
% of people knowing NASA mission is to deceive25%
% of people knowing history as we know it, is false16%
% of people knowing factory process food is fake food15%
% of people knowing money is a tool of slavery20%
February 04, 1989
"...Scientists from the United States Commerce Department’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said that a study of temperature readings for the contiguous 48 states over the last century showed there had been no significant change in average temperature over that period. Dr. (Phil) Jones said in a telephone interview today that his own results for the 48 states agreed with those findings." More NASA/NOAA Corruptions.
New York Times
Right after the year 2000, NASA and NOAA dramatically altered US climate history, making the past much colder and the present much warmer. The animation above shows how NASA/NOAA cooled 1934 and warmed 1998, to make 1998 the hottest year in US history instead of 1934. This alteration turned a long term cooling trend since 1930 into a warming trend. But NASA and NOAA have a little problem. The EPA still shows that heatwaves during the 1930s were by far the worst in US temperature record. Source said. "We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." - William Casey. CIA Director.
NASA Hiding temperature Decline
He who controls the present controls the past. He who controls the past controls the future. - George Orwell 1984 Make no mistake about it, global warming is the biggest scientific fraud in history.
Sea Level Fraud
Every single thing NASA says about sea level is fraudulent. NASA’s own data says that Antarctica ice growth is reducing sea level.
Much of the capital available at HYDROLOOP is provided on a subscription basis – where HYDROLOOP underwriters join together as Corporates/Syndicates and where Corporates/Syndicates members join together.
- to maintain, promote economic growth, and underwrite human progress
- to protect our syndicates market's reputation and services
- to fund research, to reports and analyse all field of industry's knowledge bases